This post has already been read 1059 times!

Orion archeology and astronomy together to find out the similarities. It all began in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, in 1982. Along the main gallery, the eyes of his friend Robert Bauval (construction engineer scholar of Egyptology) were captured by an aerial photograph of the pyramids of Giza. Never before had he happened to notice the curious shift of Menkaure from the aligned southwest of the two largest pyramids. All three pyramids were arranged each along its meridian axis (north-south). In addition, the two largest were placed along the southwest diagonal, indicating a probable unity of the project.Pyramids of Giza

Orion archeology and astronomy together to find out the similarities. 

But something did not seem to work. Why Menkaure, just as powerful as its predecessors and even more beloved by his people, he erected a much smaller and less majestic monument? And also, because that little pyramid seemed to deviate from the project started? One thing was certain: Menkaure knew that its construction would be much smaller than the other two in Giza. similar monuments had to be planned well in advance, and the Pharaoh was to have approved the plan. Why approve a project that would have dwarfed compared to the two predecessors? The point is that the pyramids of Giza were not considered as single monumental works, but as parts of a larger monument, which made the Giza Necropolis, and the land of the dead, the Duat, a place “where Osiris”. At this point, the questions were: because the general plan called for two large pyramids and a smaller one? How to connect the pyramids to Osiris? and because moving the smallest to the east? In 1983, on a starry night of Saudi Arabia, Robert awoke with a friend paused to admire the stars of Orion’s Belt and the Milky Way. While his friend taught him to calculate the point of rising of Orion on the horizon, Robert realized that the smaller star of the Belt was moved slightly to the east, and all three stars were slanted in a southwest direction with respect to ‘axis of the Milky Way.Orion Milky Way

The came to mind the Pyramid Texts:


“The Duat has grasped the hand of the king at the point where Orion … O King Osiris … Go to the Waterway can … a way of stars up to Duat lie down for you at the point where Orion …” On 22 March 1993, the media around the world announced with great emphasis that Rudolf Gantenbrink, an unknown German engineer robotics expert, had made the most significant archaeological discovery of the century. Hired by the Institute of the German Archaeological Cairo to improve ventilation of the Great Pyramid, Gantenbrink had sent a small robot controlled remotely, Wepwawet 2 (in ancient Egyptian “he who opens the way”) of the southern shaft of the Queen’s Chamber. Has stopped, after about 65 meters, the robot sent through a video the images of what appeared to be a small door with a fascinating slit below. The conduit measuring 20×20 centimeters.Wepwawet 2

But then the purpose of ventilation ducts should not be to ventilate, but something else. On April 1, 1993, by fax at Robert Rudolf, he sent the results of his measurements conducted on the inclinations of the Great Pyramid.

Since all the angles were slightly stronger than first estimated, the era of the Great Pyramid would have been a bit ‘more recent. The lines north and south of the King’s Chamber were fixed respectively to Zeta Orionis and Alpha Draconis; the southern shaft of the Queen’s Chamber was facing Sirius. The conclusion was inevitable. The Great Pyramid was built in a period between 2475 BC and 2400 B.C., and then, in a median date around 2450 B.C. The latest measurements of Rudolf confirmed that the two southern ducts were built around the same time and that the duct highest pointed toward Zeta Orionis, the lowest star in Orion’s belt, in correspondence with the Great Pyramid framework in the correlation theory Orion. The three marked now conducted exactly the arrangement of the stars and back to around 2450 BC. Astronomy is fundamental to the theory of Bauval Correlation. In about 26,000 years the earth cycle fluctuates slightly on its axis and this produces an apparent change of position of the stars. This phenomenon is known as precession (the stars at every half cycle, will lower declination or higher relative to the horizon). When the earth fluctuates, the North Star, which marks approximately the Celestial Pole, changes.precession

Currently, it is Polaris, of Ursa Minor, who branded the Celestial Pole but at the time of the Pyramids was marked by Thuban in the constellation of the Dragon.

Orion archeology and astronomy together to find out the similarities.

In 12,000 A.D. Vega will mark the Polo. But then, if Bauval found confirmation of the historical period when the pyramids, where would the mystery were built? Nothing Atlantis or aliens? In fact, the search for Bauval was complicated due to such discoveries but was scratched at all, in fact, I was revived.

Orion archeology and astronomy together to find out the similarities.

The latest measures undertaken have confirmed the extraordinary precision of the Great Pyramid builders when they stressed the ducts of Sirius and Orion’s Belt. Because, probably, knew the precessional changes, was also likely to have become aware of how those activities mark the era (c. 2450 BC) in the Egyptian religious texts, often we read of “Prime Time” where Osiris ruled Egypt during an early age gold.

Orion archeology and astronomy together to find out the similarities.

The Egyptians believed that long before the gods had established the cosmic order and the system had moved on their land. A race of gods had ruled Egypt for many millennia before giving it to the fatal line yet divine pharaohs. The Pharaohs, meanwhile, accounted for priestly connection with the gods and, by extension, the link with the Prime Time, which guarded the laws and of wisdom knowledge. At that time it went up the First Time? Was it possible to use the ducts and the precession to establish it? And the question had to do with the precessional cycle of Orion’s Belt? Robert Bauval and Adrian Gilbert, authors of the book, decided to further investigate the precessional cycles and returned to Skyglobe 3.5 to identify the period when the belt of Orion had begun his final round.

The ancient astronomer-priests of Heliopolis knew the secrets of time because they observed and studied the apparent motion of the stars, the sun, and the moon. They were then able to make an indicator that the centuries were able to define an era. So it was with the date of construction of the Pyramid of Cheops. The secret was the knowledge of the precession of the stars and the ability to calculate the measure of change for the stars of Orion, to the Hyades and Sirius. Robert Adrian and analyzed on the computer changes in the declination and height for crossing the meridian of Zeta Orionis over 13,000 years (data we omitted to simplify the talk).

Orion archeology and astronomy together to find out the similarities.

This is what emerged from the visual picture of the southern sky around 10,400 B.C. .: disposition of Orion’s Belt view to “west” of the Milky Way coincides with impressive precision, with the design and alignment of the three pyramids of Giza! Around 2450 BC the era in which it was built the Great Pyramid, observers perceived the relationship when they saw the Orion Belt to the east at the time of the helical rising of Sirius, in a perfect match “in Meridian Meridian,” ie, with the two images exactly overlapped, this is the moment when we see the First time of Orion’s Belt around 10,450 BC.

Orion archeology and astronomy together to find out the similarities.

Because of a date so far? Why give us a precessional measure defined by the southern shaft of the King’s Chamber related to Orion’s belt? Because the architect who designed this conduit and probably the whole pyramid would attract our attention on that early date the First Time of Osiris, fastened around 10,450 BC? I seem to have shown what are the cardinal points of the correlation theory formulated by Robert Bauval in recent years and still under development. But I would finally make you reflect on the period 10,450 BC. Those of you who read Plato’s Timaeus made immortal by the myth of Atlantis that in this dialogue and in the Critias is developed, it will be noticed that he had already familiarized with this date. Well, for newbies I want to clarify that that date, according to Plato, marks the end of the supremacy of Atlantis and the catastrophic denouement of a thriving civilization that still do not know whether it existed or not.Plato Timaeus

That there is a link between the divine lineage of Atlantis and the First Time of Osiris and of Ancient Egypt? That it should reconnect the common project of the Giza plateau with the express intention of handing down the centuries to come to the date on which a race of gods or god-men established the dominion over the lands of the Nile? That Egypt and its history are the key to understanding the mystery of our origins?

Orion archeology and astronomy together to find out the similarities.



To open the video click on the image, good view from your Alessandro Brizzi.

Orion archeology, and astronomy together to find out the similarities.