This post has already been read 2143 times!

The shocking truth of the RH.

Many of us have got to know something about the blood groups by science learned in school lessons. However, if you compare the school knowledge with studies and debates published in scientific journals, you realize how the most interesting data on the subject were ‘accidentally’ omitted from the basic educational programs. There is no plausible scientific explanation as to the provenance of the RH negative group. Orthodox science merely speculate that it is a vaguely identifiable, random genetic mutation. About 85% of human beings have the ape-RH gene, while the remaining 15% is not found the RH factor (RH-), which could be explained by the presence of an alien gene.

This article explores the thesis that humanity has been brought up as a race of slaves, from the moment that 97% of our genetic code is disabled, and we have only 3%, just useful to survival. The most common type of human blood is the group 0, which is universal. The blood types are divided into two groups: positive and negative according to the RH factor. The Rhesus factor is so named because it is connected to the genetic link between human and rhesus monkeys, detectable by a specific blood protein.

When blood of an individual is the RH factor, it is said that his blood type is positive RH (RH +). If the test returns a negative result, it means that the rhesus factor is absent. It was proved that one of the more stable and less susceptible to hereditary factors generational mutations was own blood.

As we said, most people – about 85% – have RH positive blood, supporting the view element that human beings have evolved from primates. However, there is a remaining 15% that is totally devoid of the RH factor. While blood type falls among the least mutable genetic characteristics, from where would come the RH negative type? It is a question that for decades has left scientists puzzled. Some evidence suggests that the negative RH factor has appeared on the planet about 35,000 years ago, in some very limited geographical areas, to seem connected with some particular social groups and tribes. The areas in which its presence was found to a greater extent are northern Spain, southern France and the Basque ethnicity. Another ethnic group with high concentration of RH- factor is the Jewish East.

In general, about 40% of the European population owns RH- factor. Only 3% of Africans and 1% of Asians and Native Americans is RH-.Based on this statistical information, it is not difficult to trace the geographical areas in which the RH- factor may have been originally introduced into the human genetic code. We are talking of the Caucasus region.

From the scientific point of view, if the RH-negative factor was indeed a blood type ‘normal’, what should be criticized for the problems that arise when a mother gives birth to a RH- RH + baby? It is a hemolytic disease, or rather of an allergic reaction that can lead to serious consequences when the two different blood groups from mixing during pregnancy, since the antigenic substances in the RH- type attack RH + cells. That said, what can be criticized for a gene fight between two types of equally human blood? We are dealing with a blood group alien? There is only another case in nature in which a similar reaction takes place between bodies that mate: when donkeys, and horses are crossed for the production of mules.

All this is understandable, since it is a ‘unnatural’ intersection, that does not exist in the wild. The hybridization that gives life to the mules takes place exclusively due to human intervention. Therefore, it is possible that there are two types of human beings, similar but genetically different? In most people with RH- blood type it tend to have a number of common characteristics. Here is a section from the list RH Negative Registry website.

  • Sense of not belonging
  • Tendency to seek the truth
  • Sense of having to make a ‘mission’ in life
  • Empathy and compassion
  • A rib and / or an additional vertebra
  • above-average intelligence quotient
  • perceptiveness extrasensory
  • Love for Space and Science
  • Increased sensitivity for the view
  • You can not clonarle
  • Body temperature less than the average
  • higher than average blood pressure (or lower than average)
  • Colour of eyes blue, green or hazel
  • Red hair or reddish cast
  • High sensitivity to heat and sunlight
  • Phobias unexplained
  • Deep sight
  • Tendency to be healers
  • Empathy for diseases
  • Tendency to cause malfunctions in electric devices
  • Tendency to be victims of alien abductions
  • Tendency to witness unexplained phenomena
  • Tendency to make vivid dreams
  • stronger immune Barriers
  • Terms of autoimmunity markers and antigen HLA B27
  • Light skin, melanin imbalances and vitamin D deficiencies
  • Ability to process the CO2 more efficiently than average.
  • Imbalances of Iron and Copper
  • Sensitivity to environmental allergies

It can be argued from the elements shown? E ‘was shown that the blood is the organ with less chance of mutation. If you exclude the one we are debating, science has never recorded other genetic mutations in the blood. Element that supports the argument that the RH- factor has been introduced by an external source, for example similar to human beings, but not land. It possible that an alien species has manipulated the existing life on the planet to create the modern man? Many ancient texts, including the Bible, seem to support this theory. Many stories in the ancient texts, in particular those contained in the pre-Christian texts, tell of a race come from heaven that he created man in his own image. Primitive man identified them as gods by the extraordinary longevity, and capable of performing miracles, such as flying on strange vehicles and causing deafening roars shooting fire by such means. Human beings witnessed the erection of colossal monuments and beautiful city by these seemingly divine creatures. Because from the point of view of a primitive humanoid they could only appear as gods.

But really who they were, these gods? The myths tell us much about them. Through what was supposedly an advanced technology were able to fly in space. They were masters of aviation, metallurgy, astronomy, medicine and – of course – genetics. They knew the atomic energy and used it its destructive power, judging by the evidence adduced by the paleo-geology studies. They knew the techniques of agriculture and they knew how to create more nutritious food derivatives and other cereals. All the grains with which human beings are still today feed appeared simultaneously on the planet in the course of a period not longer than 10,000 years. Very short time, biologically speaking, beyond which no new form of grain was more developed.

Our ancient texts tell us that one day these creatures began to mate with humans. The Bible says that the gods looked at women and found pleasant to the eyes, and then took them for wives, and conceived children, many children. In the first part of the article I described what happens when two genetically similar but not identical, are crossed. They produce hybrids, such as mules resulting from hybridization of horses and donkeys. However, the non-perfect compatibility gene causes the sterile arise mules. Consequently when humans would have been created, they may have been the result of an optimized hybridization using advanced technology, from the point of view of reproductive capacity. They may have been created three prototypes, each one more advanced than the last. The first two would have acted only as an experimental process to reach final type. It is suspected that Neanderthal man was one of the first results of these experiments, while it would be much higher the possibility that the Cro-Magnon has been produced by such experiments. The last type would be paid to what we now call proto-humanity, and it would descend the modern man, that is the end result of crosses between the ‘for’ and the proto-humanity.

This intersection in large part would not have drawbacks from the point of view of reproduction, with the exception of a bloodline who developed the RH-negative factor, which inherited the blood protein that is not connected to the apelike ancestors. For centuries, European rulers were persecuted by haemophilia or ‘blood disease.’ It seems that Queen Victoria was a ‘carrier’ of hemophilia, and passed it on to all his children, who in turn married with rulers of other European countries, infecting nearly all European royal houses between 1800 and 1900. Consequently hemophilia was renamed ‘Royal Disease.’ To connect the items just mentioned, we must add that currently only 5% of men in all the royal houses of the world are carriers of a blood type RH-. In short, a percentage that is placed below the average of the general population. This indicates that most of the sovereign is not RH-. And ‘this is the reason of so-called’ arranged marriage ‘?

For the record, the ethnic group with the highest rates of blood is RH- the Berbers of Morocco. From the territorial point of view, one study found that the highest concentration of RH- you can find in the current Iraq. It seems that the race of Berbers have originated thousands of years ago on the border between Syria and Iraq.

And that the theory which European rulers refuse intermarriage with RH- individuals not to mix with the blood line’ Arab ‘? Indeed, it seems that the strain RH- of the Basque peoples comes from wayfarers Berbers arrived in those territories by sea already in 8000 BC. Many ancient cave paintings found in those territories are attributable to these ‘foreigners’ from the great artistic skills. The only thing certain is that if the royal families of Europe refuse to mix their blood with individuals RH-means that they are a ‘bloodline’ the opponent. Curious to see how the institution of marriage in certain cases, as well as a ‘dynastic enterprise’ is a form of perverse ‘Gene war.’ For example through the contagious pass a resolution to an ancient disease. To find out how old, you have to look at the figure of El Zarhawi.

The father of modern surgery was El Zarhawi or Albucasis. He described in his studies a disease that led to the males of a given family to die as a result of the more mundane injuries. The long name was Abul Qasim Khalaf ibn al-Abbas al-Zahravi. He was born and raised at Zahra, Real village of Cordova (Arabic: Qurtuba), capital of Muslim Spain. As the history teaches us, Zahra competed in grandeur and magnificence with Baghdad. Al-Zahravi occupied the role of doctor to the king’s court of Al-Hakam-II of Spain, and died in 1013 AD after a long and distinguished career in which he devised many modern surgical instruments. Introduced new procedures such as cauterization of wounds, crushing of stones in the bladder, the vivisection and dissection, and devised many new medical techniques. Among other things, Al-Zahravi was the first to provide a detailed description of hemophilia. Based on these premises it is not hard to wonder if the good doctor has ever taken care of some component of Arab royal families ‘Moors’, in Spain at the time, ill with hemophilia. It is not difficult to wonder how an alleged aristocratic blood like that of Queen Victoria may have contracted the strange disease of Arab origin. He was acquired by his ancestors of the Spanish royal family? It seems that Victoria was a direct descendant of the Spanish King Ferdinand of Castile, who lived in the eleventh century AD.

In other words, it is possible that female descendants of Victoria, healthy carriers of the hemophilia gene, joining in marriage with many components of royal bloodlines all over Europe, have been used to sabotage the future royal bloodlines, contaminating the line of male descendants concurrent blood? We conclude with a curiosity. The expression ‘blue’ blood with which you define the subject without the RH factor, derived from the Spanish sangre azul, which indicates membership of a noble family, and refers to the fact that in the Spanish natives lighter skinned the veins observe the visibly pale body as light blue lines, attribute not possessed by those of Arabic descent. The term was coined after the occupation of Spain by the Moors (VIII – XV century AD.), When the two ethnicities intermingled with mixed marriages. The Spanish aristocracy, especially some Castile, refused to mingle with the Moors, and retained this feature. Since then, the blue-blooded phrase was used to describe the most ancient and aristocratic families.



To open the video click on the image, good view from your Alessandro Brizzi.